SrIvachana bhUshaNam – sUthram 370

SrI: SrImathE SatakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:

Full Series

<< Previous

avathArikai (Introduction)

When asked “Can whatever that occurred due to self on account of thinking about the relationship, be said as bhagavAn’s fault?” piLLai lOkAchAryar explains that it can be done like that with an example.

sUthram 370

prajai theruvilE idaRith thAy mudhugilE kuththumApOlE, nirupAdhika bandhuvAy SakthanAy irukkiRavan vilakkAdhozhindhAl appadich chollalAmiRE.

Simple Explanation

Just as a child which slips and falls on the street will hit the mother on her back [blaming her for its fall], when bhagavAn, who is natural relative and well capable, does not eliminate the suffering, it can be said that he is at fault.

vyAkyAnam (Commentary)

prajai …

That is – when a child, who is roaming on the street to play, hurts its leg by slipping and falling, will return home crying and will think that it acquired such sorrow due to its mother, and will hit her on her back; similarly, bhagavAn who is having natural relationship with AthmA which cannot be severed, and who has under his control the AthmA’s karma, nature and material aspects, while he has the ability to eliminate the sorrows of the AthmA, if he allows the AthmA to suffer without stopping his sufferings, he can be blamed that he is tormenting the AthmA with such karma etc.

adiyen sarathy ramanuja dasan

archived in https://granthams.koyil.org/

pramEyam (goal) – https://koyil.org
pramANam (scriptures) – https://granthams.koyil.org
pramAthA (preceptors) – https://acharyas.koyil.org
SrIvaishNava Education/Kids Portal – https://pillai.koyil.org

Leave a Comment