thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 66

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous The AchArya now begins to establish the characteristics of knowledge that were mentioned earlier, starting with its nithyathva (eternity). A doubt naturally arises: If knowledge is eternal, how can people commonly say, “Knowledge has arisen in me,” or “My knowledge has … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 65

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous A doubt may arise here: Is the knowledge of all sentient beings of the same nature? AchArya answers this by explaining that the extent of knowledge differs according to the contraction (sankOcha) and expansion (asankOcha) experienced by the three classes of … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 64

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous The AchArya now answers the question raised in the previous sUthram by explaining the differences (vaidharmya) between the essential nature of the soul (svarUpa) and its attributive knowledge (gyAna). sUthram 64 ஸ்வரூபம் தர்மியாய், ஸங்கோச விகாஸங்களுக்கு அயோக்யமாய், தன்னையொழிந்தவற்றை ப்ரகாஶிப்பியாமலே, தனக்குத்தான் ப்ரகாஶிக்கக் கடவதாய், … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 63

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous After establishing the similarities (sAdharmya) between the soul (svarUpa) and its knowledge (gyAna), the AchArya now raises the question that naturally arises in the mind of an inquisitive student (thajjigyAsu): If they share so many common characteristics, what then is the … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 62

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous Having defined the essential characteristic of the individual soul as SEshathvaththOdE kUdina gyAthruthvam, the AcArya now explains the relationship between the soul (svarUpa) and its knowledge (gyAna). He first points out the characteristics that are common to both. sUthram 62 இவர்களுடைய … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 61

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous Having explained the nature of the self (Athma-svarUpa) in detail, piLLai lOkAchAryar now presents a simple defining characteristic (lakshaNa) of the self. Earlier, he explained many characteristics of the self, such as: Among these, ajadathva, Anandha-rUpathva, avyakthathva, achinthyathva, niravayavathva, nirvikArathva, and … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 60

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous sUthram 60 ஆகையால், ஆத்மபே4த3ம் கொள்ளவேணும். AgaiyAl, Athma bhEdham koLLa vENum. Meaning Therefore, the distinction among individual souls (Athma-bhEdha) must be accepted. Explanation Conclusion of the previous discussion piLLai lOkAchAryar now concludes the discussion that began with: “சிலர் ஆத்மபேதமில்லை; ஏகாத்மாவேயுள்ளது என்றார்கள்“.“silar Athma … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 58 – 59

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous sUthram 58 அப்போது தே3வமநுஷ்யாதி3 பே4த3மும், காமக்ரோதா3தி3பேத3மும் கழிந்து, ஆத்மாக்கள் ஸ்வரூபம் அத்யந்தம் ஸமமாய், ஒருபடியாலும் பே4த4ம் சொல்லவொண்ணாதபடி இருந்ததேயாகிலும்; appOdhu dhEva manushyAdhi bhEdhamum, kAma krOdhAdhi bhEdhamum kazhindhu, AthmAkkaL svarUpam athyantham samamAy, oru padiyAlum bhEdham solla oNNAdhapadi irundhadhEyAgilum; Meaning Even though, in the state of liberation, … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 57

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous sUthram 57 மோக்ஷதஶையிலும் பே4த3ம் உண்டாகையாலே. mOksha dhaSaiyilum bhEdham uNdAgaiyAlE. Meaning Because distinction exists even in the state of liberation (mOksha). Explanation Refutation of the opponent’s interpretation In the previous sUthram, the opponent argued that the Sruthi passages teach only aupAdhika-bhEdha (differences … Read more

thathva thrayam (Commentary) – sUthram 56

SrI: SrImathE satakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: SrImadh varavaramunayE nama:  Full Series << Previous sUthram 56 ஶ்ருதி, ஒளபாதி3கபே4த4த்தைச் சொல்லுகிறதென்னவொண்ணாது. Sruthi aupAdhika bhEdhaththaich chollugiRadhenna oNNAdhu. Meaning It cannot be said that the Sruthi teaches only differences arising from upAdhis (limiting adjuncts). Explanation The opponent’s argument If the previous Sruthi teaches Athma-bhEdha, then it would appear to … Read more